PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA WANPRESTASI ANTARA PT. PLN (PERSERO) APP BALI DENGAN PT.GLOBAL TWIN STAR MELALUI JALUR NEGOSIASI

Authors

  • Eka Rahmat Andrianto Undiknas University
  • I Made Wirya Darma Undiknas University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38043/jah.v1i1.247

Abstract

State-owned Enterprise PT.PLN (persero) App Bali made a tender on travo 150/20 jobs. The tender was won by PT. Global Twin Star, in it’s work there are disputes in the contract agreement. So from this dispute the author takes the formulation of the problem as follows. How to resolve disputes between the two sides. The second is how the implementation of the settlement results through negotiations. The purpose of the writer is to know and analyze how the results of the settlement through negotiations and also find out whether this implementation is very relevant for both parties each achieved. Agreement made and agreed by PT. PLN (Persero) with PT. Twin Star applies as a law for both parties or called the principle pacta sunt servanda. Settlement through Alternative Dispute Resolution is based on the spirit of win-win solution. Therefore, taking into account future interests, then from the parties to the dispute there must be a desire to maintain their good relationship. Implementation obtained is a continuous relationship of work between the two sides. Where the PT. Global twin star gets additional work from PLN to maintain existing transformer and owned PT.PLN. PLN's transformer is well maintained until the work is done. In a business dispute the parties prefer to avoid to resolve their dispute through the courts. setlement of specific defaults disputes and business disputes in general to be resolved through atlernative negotiated settlement disputes. This is because the company's good name is maintained, cost and time are also more efficient if through this path. The result of dispute resolution through alternative dispute resolution, able to merely render the objectives of the law itself, namely justice, certainty and benefit.

Keywords: Dispute Settlement, Wanprestasi, Negotiation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdulkadir Muhammad. 2010. Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti. Bandung

Abdulkadir Muhammad, 2014. Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Citra ditya. Bandung

Agus Budiarto. 2009. Kedudukan dewn dan tanggung jawab perseroan terbatas. Ghalia Indonesia. Jakarta.

Agus yudha Hernoko. 2010. Hukum perjanjian asas proposional dalm kontrak komersial. Prenada media group. Jakarta.

Ahmad Yani & Gunawan Wijaya. 2003. Perseroan Terbatas. Raja Grafindo. Jakarta

Amiruddun & Zaenal Asikin. 2006. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta

Burhan ashshofa. 2004. Metoda Penelitian Hukum. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta

Dean G. Pruitt & Jeffrey Z. 2004. Konflik sosial. Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta.

Dr. Frans Hendra ,S.H.,M.H, 2013, Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa, Sinar Grafika, edisi Kedua, Jakarta.

Esmi Warasih, 2010, pranata hukum sebuah telaah sosiologi. PT. Suryadaru Utama. Semarang

Gatot Supramono. 2007. Kedudukan perusahaan, Rineka Cipta. Jakarta

H.Salim.HS. 2013. Penerapan teori Hukum pada penelitian tesis dan disertasi. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta

Joni Emirzon, 2000, Alternatif penyelesaian sengketa di luar pengadilan (negosiasi, mediasi, konsiliasi, & arbitrase), Gramedia pustaka utama, Jakarta.

Lukman santoso Az, 2011, Hak dan Kewajiban Hukum nasabah bank. Pustaka yustitia, Yogyakarta.

Muchsin, 2006, Ikhtisar Ilmu Hukum, Badan Penerbit Iblam, Jakarta

Munir Fuady. 2014. Konsep Hukum Perdata. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta

Munir Fuady. 2013. Teori-teori besar dalam Hukum. Prenada media group. Jakarta

Murjiyanto.R. 2002. Pengantar Hukum Dagang aspek-aspek Hukum perusahaan dan larangan Praktek monopoly. Liberty. Yogyakarta.

Nyoman Putra Jaya, 2007, Politik Hukum. Undip press, Semarang

Nindyo purnomo. 2003. Hukum komersil. Pusat Penerbitan UT. Jakarta

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2003. Batas-batas kebebasan berkontrak. Yuridika Vol.18.

Prof. Mr. Dr. Sudargo Gautama, 1999, Undang-undang arbitrase baru 1999, Citra Aditya bakti, bandung.

Rachmadi Usman. 2004. Dimensi Hukum Perusahaan Perseroan Terbatas. Alumni. Bandung

Rachmat syafaat. 2006. Advokasi dan pilihan penyelesaian sengketa. Agritek YPN kerjasama dengan SOFA Press. Cetakan Pertama. Malang.

Romli Atma Sasmita. 2013. Pengantar Hukum Kejahatan Bisnis. Kencana. Bogor

R. Murjiyanto. Pengantar Hukum dagang aspek-aspek hukum perusahaan dan larangan praktek monopoli. Liberty, Yogyakarta.

R. Setyawan. Pokok-pokok Hukum Perjanjian. Putra Abiding. Jakarta

R. Subekti. 1986. Aspek-aspek Hukum Perikatan Nasional. Alumni. Bandung

Sidharta. 2006. Hukum perlindungan Konsumen Indonesia. PT. Gramedia Widiarsana Indonesia.Jakarta.

Soedjono Dirjosisworo, 1983, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.

Soerjono soekanto. 2001. Sosiologi suatu Pengantar. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta

Sulaiman Yunus, 2008. Mendirikan Badan Hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Fajar utama. Bandung.

Susanti Adi Nugroho, 2009, Mediasi sebagai alternative penyelesaian sengketa, Telaga ilmu Indonesia.

Published

2020-09-27

How to Cite

1.
Andrianto ER, Darma IMW. PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA WANPRESTASI ANTARA PT. PLN (PERSERO) APP BALI DENGAN PT.GLOBAL TWIN STAR MELALUI JALUR NEGOSIASI. JAH [Internet]. 2020Sep.27 [cited 2024Jul.12];1(1):135-50. Available from: https://journal.undiknas.ac.id/index.php/JAH/article/view/247

Issue

Section

ARTIKEL