The Enforcement of Progressive Law: Optimizing Alternative Dispute Resolution as the Implementation of Pancasila Values
Keywords:
Alternative Dispute Resolution, Progressive Law, Values of PancasilaAbstract
Progressive law is a holistic legal idea. Progressive law views law as a series of rules and behavior. In practice, progressive law also mandates the implementation of alternative dispute resolutions. Alternative dispute resolution is expected to strengthen the value of the dispute so that it is more substantive and able to reconcile the parties. This study aims to explore the nature of progressive law enforcement and provide prescriptions related to progressive law enforcement that prioritizes Pancasila values, one of which is through the application of alternative dispute resolution. This research is normative legal research. Normative legal research seeks to place the law as part of society's norms based on values. The primary legal materials in this study are the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, and Law no. 30 of 2009 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. Secondary legal materials include various research and studies on alternative dispute resolution and progressive law. The non-legal material in this research results from a study on the philosophy of Pancasila, especially those relevant to law enforcement practices. The approach in this study uses a conceptual approach and legislation. The study's results confirm that the essence of progressive law enforcement is that progressive law enforcement emphasizes the nature and character of the law that is constantly evolving, emphasizes humanitarian attitudes, dares to act out of the box, and always prioritizes spiritual in addition to philosophical considerations. Alternative dispute resolution as the implementation of progressive law and Pancasila values ??is needed to maintain community family values ??and strengthen the value of local wisdom in resolving disputes in the community.
References
Afrita, I. (2015). Hukum Ketenagakerjaan dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Hubungan Industrial di Indonesia. Absolute Media.
Aidi, Z. (2020). IMPLEMENTASI E-COURT DALAM MEWUJUDKAN PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PERDATA YANG EFEKTIF DAN EFISIEN. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 49(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.1.2020.80-89
Aswandi, B., & Roisah, K. (2019). Negara Hukum Dan Demokrasi Pancasila Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia (Ham). Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i1.128-145
Banakar, R., & Travers, M. (2005). Introduction to Theory and Method in Socio-Legal Research. In THEORY AND METHOD IN SOCIAL-LEGAL RESEARCH (pp. 1–8). Hart Publishing.
Bennett, T. (2015). Indigenous peoples, customary law and human rights – why living law matters, by Brendan Tobin. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 47(1), 140–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2015.993878
Budiono, A., & Izziyana, W. V. (2018). Ilmu Hukum Sebagai Keilmuan Perspektif Paradigma Holistik. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 9(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v9i1.a6916
Disantara, F. P. (2021a). Perspektif Keadilan Bermartabat dalam Paradoks Etika dan Hukum. Jurnal Litigasi, 22(2), 205–229.
Disantara, F. P. (2021b). Konsep Pluralisme Hukum Khas Indonesia sebagai Strategi Menghadapi Era Modernisasi Hukum. Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Politik Islam, 6(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.35673/ajmpi.v6i1.1129
Disantara, F. P., Anggono, B. D., & Efendi, A. (2022). Mendudukkan Norma Etika: Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat terhadap Relasi Etika dan Hukum. Rechtsidee, 10(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v10i0.773
Dyah Ochtorina Susanti, A. E. (2021). Pancasila Dalam Teori Jenjang Norma Hukum Hans Kelsen. Legislasi Indonesia, 18(4), 518.
Eka N.A.M. Sihombing, C. H. (2022). Penelitian Hukum (1st ed.). Setara Press.
Erviana, P. D. (2020). Tahap Negosiasi dan Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dalam Penyusunan Kontrak. Acta Comitas, 5(1), 124.
Erwin, M. (2018). Reconstruction the Paradigm of Law and Justice on the Regulation of Right to Living Space of the Orang Rimba Tribe in Bukit Duabelas, Jambi Province. Sriwijaya Law Review, 2(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.vol2.iss1.110.pp56-68
Gladwin Lukman, Khu, F., Indra Kho, & Edric Victori. (2020). Batas Tanggung Jawab Hukum Dan Etis Atas Perilaku Tercela Advokat Dalam Persidangan. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 15(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v15i1.2111
Gunatilleke, G. (2021). Justifying Limitations on the Freedom of Expression. Human Rights Review, 22(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-020-00608-8
Halberda, J. (2020). The principle of good faith and fair dealingin English contract law. Pravovedenie, 64(3), 313.
Hartati, S. (2021). The Concept of Populist Economy based on Transcendental Law. LEGAL BRIEF, 10(2), 131–139.
Harun, M. (2019). Philosophical Study of Hans Kelsen ’ s Thoughts on Law and Satjipto Rahardjo ’ s Ideas on Progressive Law. Walisongo Law Review (Walrev), 1(2), 195–220. https://doi.org/10.21580/Walrev/2019.1.2.4815
Ibad, S. (2021). Hukum Administrasi Negara Dalam Upaya Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Yang Baik. Hukmy, 1(1), 57.
Ismayawati, A. (2017). Pancasila sebagai Dasar Pembangunan Hukum Di Indonesia. Yudisia, 8(1).
Junius Fernando, Z. (2020). Pentingnya Restorative Justice Dalam Konsep Ius Constituendum. Al Imarah?: Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik Islam, 5(2), 253. https://doi.org/10.29300/imr.v5i2.3493
Kurniawan, I. G. A. (2020). Valuasi Merek sebagai Jaminan Kredit Perbankan: Relevansi dalam Pembentukan Lembaga Penilai Kekayaan Intelektual. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 9(4), 767. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i04.p08
Kurniawan, I. G. A. (2022a). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Utilitarianisme. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 5(1), 282–298. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4941
Kurniawan, I. G. A. (2022b). The Reconstruction of Subjectum Litis in Term of Reflections on Constitutional Dissolution of Political Parties. Jurnal Akta, 9(1), 104–119. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v9i1.20970
Laga Sugiarto, R. F. N. (2018). Pandangan Negara Integralistik sebagai Dasar Philosofische Gronslag Negara Indonesia. Cakrawala Hukum, 9(1), 59–67.
Leonard, L. J. (2022). Can Restorative Justice Provide a Better Outcome for Participants and Society than the Courts? Laws, 11(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11010014
M. Nggilu, N. (2019). Menggagas Sanksi atas Tindakan Constitution Disobedience terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1613
Mahfud, M. A. (2019). the Relevance of Ronald Dworkin ’s Theory for Creating Agrarian Justice in Indonesia. Yustisia, 8(3), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v8i3.27386
MahfudMD, M. (2017). Membangun Politik Hukum, Menegakkan Konstitusi (2nd ed.). Rajawali Pers.
Markus Marselinus Soge, R. S. (2022). Kajian Hukum Progresif Terhadap Fungsi Pemasyarakatan Dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Pemasyarakatan. Legacy?: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundang-Undangan, 2(2), 5–24.
Mohamad, R. Bin, & Wayan, R. I. (2021). The Legal Pluralism in Law Education in Indonesia. Sociological Jurisprudence Journal, 4(1), 1–5.
Mustikajati, A. A., Ramadhan, A. R., & Fitriono, R. A. (2021). Tradisi carok Adat Madura dalam Perspektif Kriminologi dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Menggunakan Prinsip Restorative Justice. Intelektiva, 3(4), 95–107.
Nur Hidayat, D. A. (2021). Hukum Pancasila dengan Metode Penalaran Ideologi Pancasila. Negara Hukum, 12(1), 146.
Oltra Gras, I. (2021). Online Courts: Bridging the Gap Between Access and Justice. Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.2052-1871.1214
Pinto, E. P. (2017). The jurisprudence of emergency medical care in India: an ethics perspective. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 2(4), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2017.053
Prasetio, D. E., Disantara, F. P., Azzahra, N. H., & Perwitasari, D. (2021). The Legal Pluralism Strategy of Sendi Traditional Court in the Era of Modernization Law. Rechtsidee, 8, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.2021.8.702
Qamar, N., & Salle. (2019). Etika dan Moral Profesi Hukum: Ethos and Mores Profession of Law. CV SIGn.
Rahardjo, S. (2008). Membedah Hukum Progresif (3rd ed.). Kompas.
Rahardjo, S. (2010). Penegakan Hukum Progresif. Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Ramadhan, C. (2018). Konvergensi Civil Law dan Common Law di Indonesia dalam Penemuan dan Pembentukan Hukum. Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 30(2), 213. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.31169
Rifai, A. (2020). Menggapai Keadilan dengan Hukum Progresif: Sebuah Upaya Menyempurnakan Putusan Hakim pada Keadilan (1st ed.). CV Nas Media Pustaka.
Robert Pranata, Erlyn Indarti, T. L. I. (2016). Penemuan Hukum dan Pradigma: Suatu Telaah Filsafat Hukum Tentang Proses Peradilan Pidana di Pengadilan Negeri Kota Semarang. Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(4), 1–20.
Rosita. (2017). Alternatif Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa (Litigasi dan Non Litigasi). Al-Bayyinah: Journal of Islamic Law, VI(2), 99–113.
Sari, E. putri tanjung. (2012). penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran rahasia jabatan notaris. universitas indonesia.
Sayuti, S. (2018). Arah Kebijakan Pembentukan Hukum Kedepan (Pendekatan Teori Hukum Pembangunan, Teori Hukum Progresif, dan Teori Hukum Integratif). Al Risalah, 13(2), 11–22.
Serena Ghean Niagara, C. N. H. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Non-Litigasi Ditinjau Dari Undang Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 Tentang Perbankan Dan Undang Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Surya Kencana Dua, 7(1), 76.
Shidarta, S. (2020). Bernard Arief Sidharta: Dari Pengembanan Hukum Teoretis ke Pembentukan Ilmu Hukum Nasional Indonesia. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 3(2), 441–476. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.3.2.441-476
Soekarno, I. (2017). Pokok-Pokok Ajaran Marhaenisme Menurut Bung Karno (2nd ed.). Media Pressindo.
Sri Lestari Rahayu, Mulyanto, A. M. (2016). Penguatan Fungsi Kepala Desa Sebagai Mediator Perselisihan Masyarakat Di Desa. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 95(2), 340–360. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v95i0.2812
Sulaiman, K. F. (2021). Polemik Fungsi Sosial Tanah dan Hak Menguasai Negara Pasca UU Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 50/PUU-X/2012. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(1), 091. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1815
Susanto, A. F. (2019). Filsafat dan Teori Hukum Dinamika Tafsir Pemikiran Hukum di Indonesia. Prenada Media Group.
Susskind, R. (2015). The Future of the Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts. Oxford University Press.
Suteki, G. T. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Filsafat, Teori, dan Praktik) (1st ed.). Rajawali Pers.
Swenson, G. (2018). Legal pluralism in theory and practice. International Studies Review, 20(3), 438–462. https://doi.org/10.1093/ISR/VIX060
Syam, M., Ismansyah, I., Azheri, B., & Hasbi, M. (2021). Consumer protection enforcement law characteristics on civil law aspects in Indonesia. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 1471–1481. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5ns2.1976
Tjiptabudy, J., & Angga, L. O. (2020). Customary rights regulations in the Eti Village of west Seram regency, Maluku Province. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(1), 99–104.
Unayah, N. (2017). Mutual Help Activities as Social capital in Handling of Poverty (Gotong Royong Sebagai Modal Sosial Dalam Penanganan Kemiskinan). Sosio Informa, 3(1), 49–58.
Weruin, U. U. (2017). Logika, Penalaran, dan Argumentasi Hukum. Konstitusi, 14(2), 390.
Zuldin, M. (2019). Ketimpangan Sebagai Penyebab Konflik: Kajian Atas Teori Sosial Kontemporer. Temali: Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial, 9(1), 157–183.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 I Gede Agus Kurniawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
