Analysis applicability of 360-degree feedback performance appraisal as a new technique performance appraisal for civil servants

Authors

  • Toman Sony Tambunan Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Paham Ginting Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Sirojuzilam Sirojuzilam Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Yeni Absah Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38043/revenue.v1i2.3645

Keywords:

SWOT Analysis, 360-Degree Feedback Performance Appraisal System

Abstract

The literature on 360-degree feedback performance appraisal systems has attracted considerable attention by showing a link between behavior change and individual performance. This study aimed to analyze the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats to the 360-degree feedback performance appraisal system for Civil Servants in the City Government of Medan. To determine the participants in this study, it was calculated using the formula, Slovin. The data was collected through observations, interviews, and literature studies. Data analysis used qualitative descriptive analysis. The data results would be used to determine the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats to the implementation of the Civil Servants' 360-degree feedback performance assessment system in the City Government of Medan. The strategy of implementing a 360-degree feedback performance appraisal system as a performance assessment system for Civil Servants in the City Government of Medan was creating a joint commitment to support a fair and objective performance appraisal system, implement a 360-degree feedback performance appraisal system as an effective performance appraisal system for Civil Servants in the City Government of Medan, involving the participation of many parties to formulate assessment instruments, involving the participation of several parties at each interconnected level to act as an assessment team, improving the competence of human resources in conducting the appraisal process, establishing performance appraisal instruments that reflect aspects of actual attitudes, behaviors, morals, skills, and work outcomes, creating stages and performance appraisal standards, and using information and communication technology (ICT) in the delivery of appraisal instruments.

References

Articles

Agyare, R., Yuhui, G., Mensah, L., Aidoo, Z., & Ansah, I. O. (2016). The impacts of performance appraisal on employees’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment: A case of microfinance institutions in Ghana. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(9), 281-297.

Das, U. K., & Panda, J. (2018). Examining the relationship between 360-degree feedback, organizational justice, and organizational sustainability. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 11(2), 143-148.

Deepa, E., Palaniswamy, R., & Kuppusamy, S. (2014). Effect of performance appraisal system in organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and productivity. The Journal Contemporary Management Research, 8(1). 72-82.

Haddad, R. E., Karkoulian, S., & Nehme, R. (2019). The impact of 360 feedback appraisal system on organizational justice and sustainability: The mediating roles of gender and managerial levels. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 27(3), 712-728.

Iqbal, N., et al. (2013). Impact of performance appraisal on employee’s performance involving the moderating role of motivation. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 3(1), 37-56.

Karkoulian, S., Srour, F., & Canaan, M. L., (2019). The moderating role of 360-degree appraisal between engagement and innovative behaviors. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-09-2018-0321

Kumari, N., & Singh, D. (2017). Employees’ perception towards 360-degree feedback performance appraisal system. International Journal of Human Resources and Industrial Research, 4(5), 21-34.

Kuzulu, K. E., & Iyem, C. (2016). Is 360-degree feedback appraisal an effective way of performance evaluation? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Science, 6(5), 172-182.

Munguti, Benardine, K., & Kanyanjua, D. (2017). performance appraisals practices employee productivity in Kenya: A case study of savannah cement ltd. International Academic Journal of Human Resources and Business Administration, 2(4), 82-96.

Njuguna, W. K., & Maende, C. (2017). Performance appraisal systems and employee productivity in commercial banks in Nairobi County Kenya. International Academic Journal of Human Resources and Business Administration, 2(4), 329-346.

Olusadum, N. J., & Leo, M. I. (2021). 360 Degree feedback appraisal system and employee productivity of deposit money banks in Imo State Nigeria. Global Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(2), 60-72.

Siddiqui, S. T. (2017). Impact of 360-degree feedback on employee and organization growth: With reference to higher education Institutes of Pakistan. International Journal of Advanced Research, 5(4), 27-32.

Ylenia, C., Fabbril, T., Scapolan, A. C., & Boscolo, S. (2019). Performance Appraisal and innovative behavior in the digital era. Frontiers in Pschology, 10(1659), 1-12.

Books

Afrizal. (2016). Qualitative research method. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Bateman, T. S., & Snell, S. A. (2014). Management: Leading and Collaborating in a Competitive World. Salemba Empat.

Eisalou, M. R. (2014). Human resources 360-degree feedback: Performance appraisal system. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.

Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, G. R. (2013). Strategic management: An integrated approach. Cengage Learning.

Katsioloudes, M. I. (2006). Strategic management: Global cultural perspectives for-profit and non-profit organizations. Elsevier Inc.

Lapan, S. D., Quartaroli, M. T., & Riemer, F. J. (2012). Qualitative research: An introduction to methods and design. Jossey-Bass.

Mondy, R. W. (2008). Human Resource Management. Erlangga.

Taylor, Steven J., et al. (2016). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guide Book and Resource. Fourth Edition. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Wheelen, T. L., & Hunger, J. D. (2012). Strategic management and business policy toward global sustainability (13th Ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Government

Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2004 Tentang Percepatan Pemberantasan Korupsi.

Peraturan Menteri Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Sipil Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia Nomor 53 Tahun 2014 Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Perjanjian Kinerja, Pelaporan Kinerja dan Tata Cara Reviu atas Laporan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah.

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 2019 Tentang Penilaian Kinerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 Tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara.

Thesis

Anso, H. S. (2014). The impact of performance appraisal on employee performance: A Study of First Bank Nigeria Plc [A Dissertation submitted in partial to the requirements of the Royal Docks Business School]. University of East London.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-30

How to Cite

1.
Tambunan TS, Ginting P, Sirojuzilam S, Absah Y. Analysis applicability of 360-degree feedback performance appraisal as a new technique performance appraisal for civil servants. REVENUE [Internet]. 2022Apr.30 [cited 2022Sep.28];1(2):30-9. Available from: https://journal.undiknas.ac.id/index.php/REVENUE/article/view/3645

Issue

Section

Articles