Decision Support System for Extreme Poverty BLT Recipients Combining the ROC and WASPAS Methods

Authors

  • Derry Asari Nuryadi STT Wastukancana Purwakarta
  • Mochzen Gito Resmi STT Wastukancana Purwakarta
  • Chandra Dewi Lestari STT Wastukancana Purwakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38043/tiers.v4i1.4477

Keywords:

Decision Support System, Direct Cash Assistance, Extreme poverty, ROC Method, WASPAS Methode

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has begun to be under control and the basis for the Village Fund BLT distribution has been adjusted. BLT Dana Desa aims to increase the income of extremely poor families in the village. In determining and determining prospective Beneficiary Families (KPM), each village will be guided by the data for the Acceleration of Extreme Poverty Elimination (PPKE) provided by the central government through the local government which will later be verified by the village government. Therefore, a Decision Support System is needed to find out who really deserves assistance, so that the allocation can be right on target according to predetermined criteria. In this study the results of this study show that the proposed model can be used well in conducting the selection process for laboratory assistant admissions. In this research, the use of ROC is able to provide appropriate criteria weights based on the level of importance of the criteria from the decision maker. Meanwhile, the use of the WASPAS method is able to produce decisions in the form of the best alternatives that can be used to help decision makers. From the calculation process that has been done, it can be concluded that Sunardi got the highest score, namely 0.7276 and Muksin got the lowest score, namely 0.5491. The existence of this system can make it easier for the government, especially villages, to identify beneficiaries and minimize errors in selecting beneficiaries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., no. 1, 2014.

Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Menteri Desa PDTT Nomor 8 tahun 2022 tentang Prioritas Penggunaan Dana Desa tahun 2023, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 72507257, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://medium.com/@arifwicaksanaa/pengertian-use-case-a7e576e1b6bf

Republik Indonesia, INSTRUKSI PRESIDEN REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 4 TAHUN 2022 TENTANG PERCEPATAN PENGHAPUSAN KEMISKINAN EKSTREM, Instr. Pres. REPUBLIK Indones. NOMOR 4 TAHUN 2022 TENTANG PERCEPATAN PENGHAPUSAN Kemiskin. EKSTREM, no. 146187, 2022.

G. S. Mahendra et al., SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN (Teori dan Penerapannya dalam berbagai Metode). PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Vzy2EAAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&ots=RcQI-Sh4II&dq=info%3AzJZKuXEVlhsJ%3Ascholar.google.com&lr&pg=PA7#v=onepage&q&f=false

J. Kuswanto, M. N. Al Kodri, T. Devana, L. Pebriantika, and S. Ningsih, Implementation of Simple Additive Weighting For Scholarship Admission Selection, vol. 4, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.38043/tiers.v4i1.4022.

Qiyamullaily Arista, 712.ari Silvia NandasQiyamullaily Arista, Nandasari Silvia, & Amrozi Yusuf. (2020). Perbandingan Penggunaan Metode Saw Dan Ahp Untuk Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Karyawan Baru. Teknika: Engineering and Sains Journal, 4, and Amrozi Yusuf, Perbandingan Penggunaan Metode Saw Dan Ahp Untuk Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Karyawan Baru, Tek. Eng. Sains J., vol. 4, pp. 712, 2020.

A. Kuper, G. Lodde, E. Livingstone, D. Schadendorf, and N. Kramer, Mitigating cognitive bias with clinical decision support systems: an experimental study, J. Decis. Syst., pp. 120, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1080/12460125.2023.2245215.

M. G. Resmi, M. R. Muttaqin, and M. Defriani, PENENTUAN PENERIMAAN BANTUAN PANGAN NONTUNAI DENGAN METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTED, J. Inf. Technol. Comput. Sci., vol. 4, pp. 4046, 2021.

Y. Sopyan and A. D. Lesmana, Analisis Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Beasiswa Terbaik Menerapkan Metode Weight Aggregated Sum Product Assesment ( WASPAS ) dengan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid ( ROC ), vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 13341342, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i3.2525.

F. Sembiring, M. T. Fauzi, S. Khalifah, A. K. Khotimah, and Y. Rubiati, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Bantuan Covid 19 menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) (Studi Kasus: Desa Sundawenang), Explor. Sist. Inf. dan Telemat., vol. 11, no. 2, p. 97, 2020, doi: 10.36448/jsit.v11i2.1563.

A. Aditiya and Gunawansyah, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Perawat Baru Di PT. Medika Antapani dengan Pembobotan ROC dan Metode WASPAS, G-Tech J. Teknol. Terap., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 149158, 2022, doi: 10.33379/gtech.v6i2.1599.

S. A. Amanatulloh and S. Wibisono, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian BLT Desa Sidaharja Dengan Metode WASPAS, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 171179, 2022.

M. B. K. Nasution, K. Kusmanto, A. Karim, and S. Esabella, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Ketua Program Studi Menerapkan Metode WASPAS dengan Pembobotan ROC, Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 130136, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i1.1619.

K. A. Chandra and S. Hansun, Sistem Rekomendasi Pemilihan Laptop Dengan Metode Waspas, J. Ecotipe (Electronic, Control. Telecommun. Information, Power Eng., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 7681, 2019, doi: 10.33019/ecotipe.v6i2.1019.

M. E. Fitria and M. Siddik, Penerapan Metode MFEP Berbasis Web Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kompetensi Soft Skill Pegawai, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 684693, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i2.2060.

S. Supiyandi, C. Rizal, M. N. H. Siregar, E. Putra, and R. Saragih, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Biji Kopi Arabika Terbaik Menggunakan Metode SMART, Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 796802, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i2.2118.

D. Liu, T. Li, and D. Liang, An integrated approach towards modeling ranked weights, Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 147, p. 106629, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106629. [18] A. Iskandar, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelayakan Penerima Bantuan Dana KIP Kuliah Menggunakan Metode ROC-EDAS, Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 856864, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i2.2265.

A. Alinezhad and J. Khalili, New Methods and Applications in Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM). Springer International Publishing, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=9OmqDwAAQBAJ

C. Lukita, C. Nas, and W. Ilham, Analisis Perbandingan Metode MOORA dan Metode WASPAS Dalam Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Prioritas Utama Peningkatan Kualitas Mata Pelajaran, J. Nas. Teknol. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 130137, 2020, doi: 10.25077/teknosi.v5i3.2019.130-137.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-25

How to Cite

1.
Nuryadi DA, Resmi MG, Lestari CD. Decision Support System for Extreme Poverty BLT Recipients Combining the ROC and WASPAS Methods. TIERS [Internet]. 2023Jun.25 [cited 2024Jun.15];4(1):83-91. Available from: https://journal.undiknas.ac.id/index.php/tiers/article/view/4477

Issue

Section

Articles