The Interplay of Liquidity, Investment Opportunities, and Corporate Social Responsibility on Banking Performance

Authors

  • Yura Karlinda Wiasa Putri Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38043/jiab.v11i1.7597

Keywords:

Corporate Social Responsibility, Investment Opportunity Set, Loan to Deposit Ratio, Return on Assets

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of liquidity, investment opportunity set (IOS), and corporate social responsibility (CSR) on the financial performance of banking firms in Indonesia during 2022–2024. Using secondary data drawn from audited annual reports and sustainability reports, this study analyzes a balanced panel of 135 bank-year observations from 45 banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The hypotheses are tested using a fixed effect panel regression model with interaction terms to examine the moderating roles of IOS and CSR in the relationship between Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) and Return on Assets (ROA). The results show that LDR and IOS have a significant negative effect on ROA, while CSR has a significant positive effect on ROA. The interaction analysis further indicates that IOS positively moderates the effect of LDR on ROA, implying that higher IOS weakens the negative effect of LDR on profitability. In contrast, CSR negatively moderates the effect of LDR on ROA, indicating that higher CSR strengthens the negative effect of LDR on profitability. These findings suggest that bank profitability in the post-pandemic period is shaped not only by liquidity management and growth opportunities, but also by the way social responsibility interacts with lending intensity. This study contributes to the banking literature by providing recent evidence from an emerging market and by integrating financial and non-financial determinants of performance within a moderated panel-data framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, Q., Salman, A., & Parveen, S. (2022). Evaluating the effects of environmental management practices on environmental and financial performance of firms in Malaysia: the mediating role of ESG disclosure. Heliyon, 8(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12486

Andrie, A. M., & Sprincean, N. (2023). ESG performance and banks funding costs. Finance research letters, 54, 103811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103811

Aras, G., & Hacioglu Kazak, E. (2022). Enhancing firm value through the lens of ESG materiality: evidence from the banking sector in OECD countries. Sustainability, 14(22), 15302. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215302

Arvidsson, S., & Dumay, J. (2022). Corporate ESG reporting quantity, quality and performance: where to now for environmental policy and practice?. Business strategy and the environment, 31(3), 1091-1110. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2937

Aydomu, M., Glay, G., & Ergun, K. (2022). Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, S119-S127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.006

Bagiana, I. K., Putra, M. D. P., Putri, Y. K. W., Dewi, I. G. A. M. T. P., & Pebrianti, N. G. A. T. (2025). Financial performance of banking sector: the role of board gender diversity as a moderating factor. JAS (Jurnal Akuntansi Syariah), 9(1), 104-125. https://doi.org/10.46367/jas.v9i1.2415

Baldissera, A. (2023). Sustainability reporting in banks: History of studies and a conceptual framework for thinking about the future by learning from the past. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(5), 2385-2405. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2491

Cantero-Saiz, M., Polizzi, S., & Scannella, E. (2024). ESG and asset quality in the banking industry: The moderating role of financial performance. Research in International Business and Finance, 69, 102221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102221

Carnini Pulino, S., Ciaburri, M., Magnanelli, B. S., & Nasta, L. (2022). Does ESG disclosure influence firm performance?. Sustainability, 14(13), 7595. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137595

Chang, H. Y., Liang, L. W., & Liu, Y. L. (2021). Using environmental, social, governance (ESG) and financial indicators to measure bank cost efficiency in Asia. Sustainability, 13(20), 11139. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011139

Chiaramonte, L., Dreassi, A., Girardone, C., & Piser, S. (2022). Do ESG strategies enhance bank stability during financial turmoil? Evidence from Europe. The European Journal of Finance, 28(12), 1173-1211. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2021.1964556

Davis, E. P., Karim, D., & Noel, D. (2022). The effects of macroprudential policy on banks' profitability. International Review of Financial Analysis, 80, 101989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101989

Davydov, D., Vhmaa, S., & Yasar, S. (2021). Bank liquidity creation and systemic risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 123, 106031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2020.106031

Fungacova, Z., Turk, R., & Weill, L. (2021). High liquidity creation and bank failures. Journal of Financial Stability, 57, 100937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100937

Galletta, S., Goodell, J. W., Mazz, S., & Paltrinieri, A. (2023). Bank reputation and operational risk: The impact of ESG. Finance Research Letters, 51, 103494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103494

Gupta, J., & Kashiramka, S. (2024). Examining the impact of liquidity creation on bank stability in the Asia Pacific region: Do ESG disclosures play a moderating role?. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 91, 101955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2024.101955

Gutirrez-Ponce, H., & Wibowo, S. A. (2023). Do sustainability activities affect the financial performance of banks? The case of Indonesian banks. Sustainability, 15(8), 6892. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086892

Huang, J., Hsieh, S. L., & Wang, J. (2026). Sustainability disclosure and bank liquidity risk: evidence from global banking sector. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 102582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2026.102582

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Khmiri, W., & Alsulami, F. (2023). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and Islamic bank stability in GCC countries: do governance practices matter?. Cogent Business & Management, 10(3), 2260559. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2260559

Liu, J., & Xie, J. (2024). The effect of ESG performance on bank liquidity risk. Sustainability, 16(12), 4927. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124927

Loan, B. T. T., Anh, T. T. L., & Hoang, T. (2024). ESG disclosure and financial performance: empirical study of Vietnamese commercial banks. Banks and Bank Systems, 19(1), 208. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.19(1).2024.18

Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374.

Sudiyatno, B., Bagana, B. D., Hardiyanti, W., Puspitasari, E., & Safitri, S. D. (2024). The role of corporate social responsibility as a moderating factor in influencing bank performance in Indonesia. Banks and Bank systems, 19(1), 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.19(1).2024.01

Tjahjadi, B., Soewarno, N., & Mustikaningtiyas, F. (2021). Good corporate governance and corporate sustainability performance in Indonesia: A triple bottom line approach. Heliyon, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06453

Tran, Q. T., Vo, T. D., & Le, X. T. (2021). Relationship between profitability and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from Vietnamese listed banks. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), 875-883. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no3.0875

Downloads

Published

2026-05-22

How to Cite

1.
Wiasa Putri YK. The Interplay of Liquidity, Investment Opportunities, and Corporate Social Responsibility on Banking Performance. j.ab [Internet]. 2026May22 [cited 2026Jun.2];11(1):15-27. Available from: https://journal.undiknas.ac.id/index.php/akuntansi/article/view/7597

Issue

Section

Articles