Pengaruh Investasi, Kepemilikan Institusional, dan Kepemilikan Institusi Asing Terhadap Dividen Pada Perusahaan LQ45
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38043/jiab.v8i1.4185Keywords:
Investasi, Kepemilikan Institusional, Kepemilikan Institusi Asing, Pecking Order;, Fixed Effect Random Effect, Weighted Least SquaresAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh investasi, kepemilikan institusional, dan kepemilikan institusi asing terhadap kebijakan dividen. Perusahaan-perusahaan yang tergabung dalam indeks LQ45 dijadikan obyek dalam penelitian ini. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data sekunder. Data keuangan diperoleh dari laporan keuangan tahunan perusahaan, dan pusat data Osiris. Perusahaan yang diobservasi adalah perusahaan yang terdaftar dalam indeks LQ45 dari tahun 2016-2021. Jumlah observasi (sampel) sejumlah 287. Dalam teori Pecking Order disebutkan bahwa pendanaan internal menjadi pilihan pertama dalam mendanai kebutuhan pendanaan perusahaan. Metode regresi data panel dengan pendekatan fixed effect, random effect, dan weighted least squares digunakan untuk mengetahui hubungan kausalitas antara variabel bebas terhadap variabel terikat. Investasi, dan kepemilikan institusi asing berpengaruh positif terhadap kebijakan dividen perusahaan LQ45. Iterated weighted least squares regression terpilih untuk menganalisis hubungan kausalitas setelah dilakukan perbandingan dengan kedua pendekatan lainnya. Hal ini dapat disebabkan karena adanya variasi data yang tinggi. Kepemilikan institusional tidak berpengaruh terhadap kebijakan dividen perusahaan LQ45. Hal ini dimungkinakan karena Kebijakan dividen memiliki kecenderungan mengacu pada tingkat dividen sebelumnya. Para investor dapat mencermati kepemilikan institusi asing dalam berinvestasi pada perusahaan yang tergabung dalam indeks LQ45.
Downloads
References
Baba, N. (2009). Increased presence of foreign investors and dividend policy of Japanese firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 17(2), 163–174. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X08000206
Brigham, E. F., & Daves, P. R. (2019). Intermediate Financial Management (13th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning, Inc. Unless.
Bursa Efek Indonesia. (2022). Perusahaan LQ45. Retrieved from https://www.idx.co.id/id/data-pasar/data-saham/indeks-saham/
Cade, B. S., & Noon, B. R. (2003). A gentle introduction to quantile regression for ecologists. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1(8), 412–420. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0412:AGITQR]2.0.CO
Chung, K. H., & Zhang, H. (2011). Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(1), 247–273. [Cambridge University Press, University of Washington School of Business Administration]. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23018523
Claessens, S. (2006). Corporate Governance and Development. The World Bank Research Observer, 21(1), 91–122. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40282344
Dvo?ák, T. (2005). Do Domestic Investors Have an Information Advantage? Evidence from Indonesia. The Journal of Finance, 60(2), 817–839. [American Finance Association, Wiley]. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3694768
Graham, J. R. (2022). Presidential Address: Corporate Finance and Reality. The Journal of Finance, 77(4), 1975–2049. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13161
Hannan, E. J., & Quinn, B. G. (1979). The Determination of the Order of an Autoregression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 41(2), 190–195. [Royal Statistical Society, Wiley]. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2985032
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304405X7690026X
Koenker, R., & Bassett, G. (1978). Regression Quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33–50. [Wiley, Econometric Society]. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1913643
Lee, Y. K. (2022). The effect of ownership structure on corporate payout policy and performance: Evidence from Korea’s exogenous dividends tax shock. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 73, 101763. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X22000580
Mulyani, E., Singh, H., & Mishra, S. (2016). Dividends, leverage, and family ownership in the emerging Indonesian market. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 43, 16–29. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042443116300154
Myers, S. C. (1984). The Capital Structure Puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 39(3), 574–592. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03646.x
Nuryaman, N. (2009). Pengaruh Konsentrasi Kepemilikan, Ukuran Perusahaan, Dan Mekanisme Corporate Governance Terhadap Pengungkapan Sukarela. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 6(1), 89–116.
La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate Ownership Around the World. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2000). Agency Problems and Dividend Policies around the World. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 1–33. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00199
La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and Finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155. The University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/250042
Rhee, S. G., & Wang, J. (2009). Foreign institutional ownership and stock market liquidity: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(7), 1312–1324. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426609000211
Setiawan, R., Christiana, N., & Singh, S. (2020). Foreign Institutional Shareholders and Corporate Payout Policy. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 17(2).
Shapiro, S. P. (2005). Agency Theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 263–284. Annual Reviews. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/29737720
Suzuki, J. (2012). The Hannan-Quinn Proposition for Linear Regression. International Journal of Statistics and Probability, 1(2), 179–185.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 A An Arief Jusuf, Avinda Vibry Lestari, Victoria Octalisa Gunawan, Astrida
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.