Jurnal Analisis Hukum

The right to health in Vietnam and the impact of climate change

2026-02-13T13:00:22+00:00

Climate change is a global challenge that seriously affects human health and the enjoyment of human rights, especially the right to health. Vietnam is highly vulnerable to climate change due to its geographical conditions, which increases health risks and puts pressure on the health system, particularly for vulnerable groups. The article analyses the right to health in the context of climate change in Vietnam, as recognized in both international law and Vietnamese legislation. Although Vietnam has made notable progress in healthcare, climate change continues to pose serious challenges to the effective realization of the right to health. The article, therefore, highlights the need for stronger policies and actions to better protect the right to health for all.

Missing Ecocentrism in Indonesian Mining Law: Social and Environmental Justice Challenges in Development Governance

2026-02-09T00:52:06+00:00

Indonesia's resource-rich mining industry is mercilessly despoiling its environment due to a glaring absence of ecocentric safeguards. Inadequate spatial planning compounds this calamity. Scholars uncover a litany of environmental horrors – deforestation, marine pollution, waste crises, ownership disputes, and human rights violations. Indonesia's commitment to the 1972 Stockholm Declaration clashes with legislative chasms, especially in Mining Business Area (WIUP) regulation. The Omnibus Law's 2020 arrival ignites a fierce battle: ecology vs. profit. Deregulation unleashes rampant mining, imperiling habitats, soil, water, and biodiversity. Balancing growth and nature tests Indonesia's mettle. Crucially, academic research is essential for policy alignment. A shift toward ecocentrism is urged, with spatial planning preceding WIUP issuance to quell legal conflicts. Conflicts stemming from investments, evictions, and land seizures surge, affecting countless lives and vast land areas. Fostering social and environmental justice in Indonesia hinges on confronting these dire challenges. The study deploys a dual approach: conceptual research methodology develops and reinterprets ecocentrism theories, with a focus on Article 172B of Indonesian Law No. 3 of 2020, guided by legal experts in administrative, mining, spatial planning, and environmental law.

Corporate Responsibility and State Obligations for Human Rights in Tesso Nilo: Decision No. 36/G/TF/2022/PTUN.Pbr

2026-02-09T00:48:51+00:00

This study analyzes corporate responsibility and state obligations in relation to the environmental degradation of the Tesso Nilo National Park (TNTN), caused by the establishment of an illegal oil palm plantation of approximately 1,200 hectares by PT Inti Indosawit Subur. Employing a normative legal research methodology, this paper integrates international environmental law, international human rights law, and national regulatory frameworks to evaluate how corporate responsibilities ought to be fulfilled and how state obligations to protect should be exercised. The findings demonstrate that the company failed to meet its responsibility to respect human rights as prescribed under international and national standards. Conversely, the state is found to have violated both its international and domestic obligations due to negligence in preventing land encroachment, weak oversight, and the absence of effective law enforcement. The decision of the Pekanbaru Administrative Court, subsequently upheld at the appellate and cassation levels, mandated comprehensive remedies, including reforestation and permit revocation. This study concludes that the environmental damage and human rights violations in TNTN resulted from a dual failure of both state and corporate actors, and underscores the urgency of adopting binding due diligence obligations and ensuring consistent law enforcement to prevent similar harm.

Dampak Digital Divide Terhadap Aksesibilitas Layanan E-Court Bagi Masyarakat Pedesaan dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata

2026-04-17T06:44:38+00:00

Urgensi Rekonstruksi Regulasi Ketenagakerjaan Dalam Mengisi Kekosongan Hukum Pengaturan Remote Working di Indonesia

2025-12-31T04:06:05+00:00

Artikel ini mengkaji kekosongan hukum dalam pengaturan sistem kerja remote working di Indonesia serta urgensi rekonstruksi regulasi ketenagakerjaan yang adaptif terhadap perkembangan teknologi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menilai sejauh mana kerangka hukum yang ada mampu memberikan kepastian dan perlindungan bagi pekerja remote. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Undang-Undang Ketenagakerjaan, Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja, dan peraturan pelaksananya belum mengatur secara eksplisit aspek-aspek fundamental kerja jarak jauh, termasuk jam kerja, pengupahan, jaminan sosial, keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja, serta perlindungan data pribadi. Kekosongan hukum ini menimbulkan ketidakpastian hubungan kerja dan risiko yang signifikan bagi pekerja, seperti eksploitasi, beban kerja berlebih, ketidakseimbangan upah, serta potensi pelanggaran privasi. Temuan tersebut menegaskan perlunya rekonstruksi regulasi ketenagakerjaan yang komprehensif dan responsif, dengan mengadopsi praktik negara lain sebagai rujukan. Regulasi yang secara khusus mengatur remote working menjadi kebutuhan mendesak untuk menjamin perlindungan hak pekerja dan keberlanjutan model kerja digital di Indonesia

Innovation or Fraud? The Modus Operandi of Investment Startups and the Voidance of the Business Judgment Rule

2026-04-22T08:35:40+00:00

The rapid expansion of digital investment startups in Indonesia has contributed significantly to economic growth and financial inclusion. However, this development has also given rise to serious allegations of misconduct in the management of public funds. Cases involving eFishery, Investree, TaniHub, and Akseleran reveal indications of financial statement manipulation, conflicts of interest, non-transparent fundraising practices, and failures in risk management. These circumstances raise complex legal questions concerning the boundary between legitimate business misjudgment and corporate economic crime.

This study aims to normatively examine whether the conduct of digital investment startups remains protected under the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) or instead fulfills the legal elements of economic criminal offenses. The research employs a normative legal methodology, incorporating statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches. The findings indicate that practices such as financial statement manipulation, fictitious transactions and borrowers, and the concealment of material information constitute structured fraudulent conduct that effectively nullifies the protection afforded by the BJR. The principal contribution of this study lies in articulating a clearer doctrinal boundary between permissible business risk and digital economic crime, while strengthening the legal foundation for the application of corporate criminal liability to digital investment startups.